![]() ![]() I've loaded up DP with so many VIs and plugins that it took up a 16GB RAM footprint and began to respond slowly. ![]() VE keeps DP from running sluggishly under heavy loads, and allows DP to run at lower buffer settings.Įven with 64-bit DP 8.04 (which is extremely robust), running a huge VI session (vracks or no vracks), will cause DP to begin to respond sluggishly. Neither jbridge nor vracks solves the ultimate problem though. ![]() ![]() I must try this sometime to see if it any more stable or efficient, I doubt it will be, but I have not tested it. The only thing I can say in DP's defense is that I have yet to try running VIs in V Racks mode due to the fact that I only run one chunk at a time. If I run VIs in DP, I crash way too much. So, you lose that efficiency aspect when auditioning tim-e based loops etc.īut even in this case, VE still smokes DP as far as VI stability. You set the buffers in Vienna ABOVE ZERO to save computer resources. It is 1000% more stable than DP for VIs.There is ONE big bug that sucks though and I cannot get Vienna to respond to it, otherwise it is a beautiful product.The bug is that if you have time-based aspects to a VI, such as Superior Drummer's drum beat auditioning, and you have Vienna's buffers set to anything above ZERO, the loop will audition out of time.įortunately, once to drag the MIDI of the loop into DP, it will then play back IN time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |